Blog

Pennsylvania Child Custody Laws May Get a Safety Revamp

Posted by Joseph Lento | Feb 16, 2021 | 0 Comments

When you're going through a divorce, some of the most contentious decisions couples often face are regarding who will have custody of the kids and how visitation will happen. In Pennsylvania, courts prefer when couples come to a mutual decision regarding custody matters. But when one parent faces abuse, mental health, or other allegations raising safety issues, the courts will determine “the best interests of the child.” Unfortunately, how courts enact this standard can sometimes lead to tragic results.

Kayden Mancuso's Death

In 2018, seven-year-old Kayden Mancuso was killed by her father Jeffrey in an apparent murder-suicide during a court-ordered visitation. According to news reports, a court psychological evaluation described Jeffrey Mancuso as having suicidal thoughts, depression, and violent tendencies. He also had previous convictions for assault. In the year before Kayden's death, her mother sought and received a protection from abuse order. However, Kayden's family believes that the court largely ignored the protection order and Jeffrey's violent history when ordering unsupervised visitation with Kayden depending on him seeking mental health treatment. Jeffrey Mancuso left a vindictive note on his daughter's body before killing himself.

Best Interests of the Child

In Pennsylvania, courts typically consider many factors when determining the “best interests of the child” in custody and visitation matters. These factors can include:

  • Whether one party has a history of abuse and whether there is a continued risk of harm,
  • Which parent is most likely to encourage frequent contact between the child and the non-custodial parent,
  • The role and parental duties the parents performed for the child before separating,
  • The need for stability and continuity in the child's life concerning education, family, extracurricular activities, and community life,
  • The child's sibling relationships,
  • The preference of the child based on their age and maturity,
  • Which parent is more likely to maintain a stable, loving, and consistent relationship with the child and meet the child's emotional needs,
  • Whether one parent has attempted to alienate the other parent from the child, and
  • The ability of each parent to provide for appropriate childcare and care for the child.

Kayden's Law

This month, Pennsylvania legislators introduced Senate Bill 78, also known as Kayden's Law, to clarify custody law for the courts.

If passed, Kayden's law would:

  • Implement Education and Training: The law would encourage courts to implement annual training courses for judges and court personnel on child abuse and domestic violence and its impact on children.
  • Strengthen Custody and Visitation Factors: The law would revamp the factors courts consider when deciding custody and visitation matters.
  • Consider Abuse History: The law would require courts to make a finding of any history of abuse or ongoing risk of abuse.
  • Incorporate Abuse Risk into Custody Orders: The law would require that custody orders implement safety conditions and restrictions necessary to protect children.

While no court order or procedure can keep kids completely safe, the hope is that Kayden's Law will remind courts of the possible dangers at home when deciding child custody matters and require courts to implement protective measures.

Attorney Joseph D. Lento is an experienced family and criminal attorney handling cases throughout Pennsylvania. If you are facing a domestic violence charge or are embroiled in a child custody matter, he can help. Call 888.535.3686 today to schedule a consultation.

About the Author

Joseph Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento is a veteran of one of the nation's busiest family courts with nearly 20 years' experience passionately helping families. By day, he worked in the trenches of family court, and at night, he studied the law. He helped countless families while working at family court, and he went on to become an attorney, dedicating his law practice to continuing the work he started years earlier. Mr. Lento's experience both behind the scenes and on the front lines allows him to understand a client's family law matter from all angles, and allows him to find and employ the most effective strategies to get favorable outcomes for any client. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide. In the courtroom and in life, attorney Joseph D. Lento stands up when the bell rings!

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact a Family Law Attorney Today!

city.jpg

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has unparalleled experience practicing Family Law in Pennsylvania. If you are having any uncertainties about what the future may hold for you and your family, contact our offices today. Family Law Attorney Joseph D. Lento will go above and beyond the needs for any client and fight for what is fair.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu