Connecticut Child Custody Drama Highlights Importance of Information to Custody Orders

Posted by Joseph Lento | Sep 29, 2023 | 0 Comments

A recent missing child situation from Connecticut is a reminder that a judge deciding a child custody case depends on the parties to provide much of the information needed to make a ruling on a child custody order.

In the Connecticut case, a father filed a petition in August of 2021 asking a New Haven court to award him full custody of his daughter. In 2022, in Puerto Rico, the mother filed domestic violence charges against the father, and a court there issued protective orders for the mother and the daughter against the father and also issued a warrant for the arrest of the father. In July of 2023, the New Haven court awarded custody to the father, apparently unaware of the case in Puerto Rico.

In late August of 2023, the father reported the daughter as missing to Bridgeport, Connecticut, police and claimed he had not had any contact with the girl or the mother since February of 2022. The girl and her mother were located shortly thereafter, outside of Connecticut, and were reported to be “safe and in good health.”

Police then arrested the father in Connecticut based on the warrant in Puerto Rico, and extradition proceedings were filed to have him returned there.

The Information Judges Consider When Ruling on Custody Orders

In Pennsylvania, a judge considering a child custody case is required to consider a number of factors, the focus of which is “the best interest of the child.” The Pennsylvania law lists 15 different factors that the court may use when ruling on which parent to award custody to, or in some cases, what the terms of any shared custody arrangement will be.

These include:

  • The extent to which one parent is more likely to “encourage and permit” regular contact between the child and the other parent;
  • The “parental duties” that each parent regularly performs for the child;
  • Whether one parent has tried to “turn” the child against the other;
  • How close the homes of the two parents are from one another;
  • The availability of each parent to spend time caring for the child or to arrange suitable child care for the child;
  • Any history of drug or alcohol abuse involving a parent;
  • Present or past abuse by a parent, whether against the other parent, against the child, or against anyone else, including whether there are any protective orders issued against a parent.

The last point is particularly relevant to the Connecticut situation, where the court awarded the father custody despite the two protective orders and the outstanding arrest warrant issued against the father in Puerto Rico. Had the judge been informed of the situation in Puerto Rico, it's unlikely the father would have been awarded custody.

The LLF Law Firm Family Law Team Can Help

Child custody disputes are emotional ones and can be complicated to resolve. And when parents can't agree on custody terms, the decision is left to a judge. When that happens, it's vitally important that the court have as much relevant information about the parents, the child, and the family situation as possible. The experienced family law attorneys from the LLF Law Firm Family Law Team can make sure that the court has all of the information it needs to make a custody decision that is in your child's best interests. We will help you understand the child custody process, and will work with you to gather all of the information the court will need to make sure your child is properly cared for through what can be a very uncertain time in their lives, as well as afterwards.

Call the LLF Law Firm Family Law Team at 888.535.3686 to learn more about how our experienced family law attorneys can help you and your child when custody is on the line, or use our online contact form to set up a confidential consultation. We are here to listen and to help!

About the Author

Joseph Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento is a veteran of one of the nation's busiest family courts with nearly 20 years' experience passionately helping families. By day, he worked in the trenches of family court, and at night, he studied the law. He helped countless families while working at family court, and he went on to become an attorney, dedicating his law practice to continuing the work he started years earlier. Mr. Lento's experience both behind the scenes and on the front lines allows him to understand a client's family law matter from all angles, and allows him to find and employ the most effective strategies to get favorable outcomes for any client. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide. In the courtroom and in life, attorney Joseph D. Lento stands up when the bell rings!


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact a skilled Family Law Team Today!

The LLF Law Firm has unparalleled experience practicing Family Law in Pennsylvania. If you are having any uncertainties about what the future may hold for you and your family, contact our offices today. Our Family Law Team will go above and beyond the needs for any client and fight for what is fair.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.